OCPBUGS-121385: Resolve Additional Storage agnhost image through mirror - #31618
OCPBUGS-121385: Resolve Additional Storage agnhost image through mirror#31618redhat-chai-bot wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Chai Bot <chai-bot@redhat.com>
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
@redhat-chai-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-121385, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label reliability AI-generated. Review for accuracy. |
|
🗣️ We’d really appreciate your feedback here AI-generated. Review for accuracy. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: redhat-chai-bot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 5 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe additional storage end-to-end test now uses explicit assertions for image operations and pod startup. It also centralizes pod creation and readiness checks and simplifies registry-pull logging. ChangesAdditional storage test validation
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The additional-storage test consistently uses the resolved mirrored image reference and now reports image and pod startup failures explicitly. No merge-blocking risk is identified. Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
@redhat-chai-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-121385, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Signed-off-by: Chai Bot <chai-bot@redhat.com>
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
@redhat-chai-bot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This pull request was generated by the Product Reliability Agent. To help us improve product stability and CI, please focus review on functional correctness and material concerns. The agent will automatically address feedback, but we’d appreciate keeping non-blocking nits from delaying an otherwise correct PR. Within two business days, please merge, provide blocking feedback, or close the PR with a reason.
Summary
The Additional Storage end-to-end test now resolves the agnhost image through the existing
image.LocationFormapping and reuses the resolved pull spec for image-store prepopulation, image verification/removal, and both pod specifications. This keepsPullNeveraligned with the pre-populated image while preventing the test from using an unmirrored upstream runtime image.Validation
gofmt -d test/extended/node/additional_storage_e2e.gogo test ./test/extended/nodegit diff --check upstream/mainTracking
OCPBUGS-121385
AI-generated. Review for accuracy.
@stbenjam requested in Slack thread
Summary by CodeRabbit